If that’s true then help me find the other 90%.

Or maybe that’s a myth.
This is an idea that goes back to early 1800’s, often promoted by the phrenologists who thought that specific human behaviors and characteristics could be deduced by the pattern and size of bumps on the skull.
This was a hotly debated topic: some believed that brain function could be localized to particular regions of the brain and others believed that the brain acted as a whole.
Dr. Eric Chudler, a behavioral neurophysiologist, and Research Associate Professor in the Department of Anesthesiology at the University of Washington, wrote a well researched article that refutes the 10% concept.
The myth started 100 years ago and has stuck.
A prominent researcher, Karl Spencer Lashley (1890-1958), believed that memory was not dependent on a specific part of the cerebral cortex. Rather the loss of memory was proportional to the amount of cerebral cortex that was removed.
He showed that the ability of rats to solve simple tasks, such as mazes and visual discrimination tests, were not affected by large cerebral cortical lesions. As long as a certain amount of cortex remained, the rats appeared normal on the tests he did.
Those experiments led to the belief that only a small portion of the brain is used.
Next thing you know prominent people were supporting the idea that we don’t use much of our brain’s capacity – folks like physicist Albert Einstein and anthropologist Margaret Mead.
Who’s counting!
Give or take a few, there’s about 100 billion neurons in the human brain. Plus there’s another ten to fifty times that number of glial cells in the brain.
Would you behave normally without 90 billion neurons and billions of glial cells? Would you be just fine if 90% of your brain was removed?
Scientists have proven this 10% idea is a myth.
Brain imaging (positron emission tomography scans or PET scans) show that much of your brain is active while you perform different tasks.
You can develop disabilities as a result of damage to small areas of your brain, such as those caused by strokes. And some neurological disorders like Parkinson’s disease also affect only specific areas of the brain. Damage to even a small part of the brain seems to have significant effects.
Evolution wouldn’t work this way either.
From an evolutionary perspective, it is unlikely that a brain that is 90% useless would develop. The brain is an expensive organ to maintain and utilizes a large supply of the body’s energy resources.
Dr. Chudler’s conclusion? There is no hidden storehouse of untapped brain power. We use all of our brain.
Dr. Chudler’s article appeared on the Brain Connection website:
http://www.brainconnection.com/
Also, The Brain Blog written by Michael Merzenich, PhD is a good read.
And don’t let those 100 billion neurons sit around idly. They could be solving some of these tough puzzles available on our website: braingamessoftware.com
By the way, those wacky phrenologists not only thought they could read the bumps on your skull, but they would write all over your head. Warning: take them off your medical provider list.























